Sets of natural numbers with proscribed subsets
Kevin O'Bryant

TL;DR
This paper investigates upper bounds on the size of subsets of natural numbers avoiding specific configurations, such as geometric progressions and multiplicative squares, providing new bounds for families closed under dilation.
Contribution
It introduces new upper bounds for the maximum size of subsets avoiding certain geometric and multiplicative patterns, especially for families closed under dilation.
Findings
Derived new upper bounds for sets avoiding geometric progressions with integer and rational ratios.
Established bounds for sets excluding multiplicative squares.
Analyzed families of subsets closed under dilation to generalize the bounds.
Abstract
Fix , a family of subsets of natural numbers, and let be the maximum cardinality of a subset of that does not have any subset in . We consider the general problem of giving upper bounds on and give some new upper bounds on some families that are closed under dilation. Specific examples include sets that do not contain any geometric progression of length with integer ratio, sets that do not contain any geometric progression of length with rational ratio, and sets of integers that do not contain multiplicative squares, i.e., nontrivial sets of the form .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLimits and Structures in Graph Theory · Analytic Number Theory Research · Advanced Topology and Set Theory
