Higher Criticism for Large-Scale Inference, Especially for Rare and Weak Effects
David Donoho, Jiashun Jin

TL;DR
This paper reviews the Higher Criticism method for large-scale inference, highlighting its adaptability, computational efficiency, and advantages over traditional error control procedures, especially in detecting rare and weak effects.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of HC's application in testing and feature selection, including theoretical insights, practical examples, and extensions to new problems.
Findings
HC effectively detects rare and weak signals in large datasets.
HC outperforms FDR and FwER in certain rare/weak settings.
HC is computationally efficient and adaptable to various problems.
Abstract
In modern high-throughput data analysis, researchers perform a large number of statistical tests, expecting to find perhaps a small fraction of significant effects against a predominantly null background. Higher Criticism (HC) was introduced to determine whether there are any nonzero effects; more recently, it was applied to feature selection, where it provides a method for selecting useful predictive features from a large body of potentially useful features, among which only a rare few will prove truly useful. In this article, we review the basics of HC in both the testing and feature selection settings. HC is a flexible idea, which adapts easily to new situations; we point out simple adaptions to clique detection and bivariate outlier detection. HC, although still early in its development, is seeing increasing interest from practitioners; we illustrate this with worked examples. HC is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
