Negative temperatures and the definition of entropy
Robert H. Swendsen, Jian-Sheng Wang

TL;DR
This paper defends the validity of negative temperatures in thermodynamics by contrasting volume entropy with a probability-based entropy definition, showing the latter aligns with thermodynamic principles.
Contribution
It demonstrates that volume entropy is inconsistent with thermodynamics for systems with non-monotonic energy densities, supporting the validity of negative temperatures.
Findings
Volume entropy conflicts with thermodynamic postulates.
Probability-based entropy satisfies thermodynamic principles.
Negative temperatures are consistent with thermodynamics.
Abstract
The concept of negative temperature has recently received renewed interest in the context of debates about the correct definition of the thermodynamic entropy in statistical mechanics. Several researchers have identified the thermodynamic entropy exclusively with the "volume entropy'' suggested by Gibbs, and have further concluded that by this definition, negative temperatures violate the principles of thermodynamics. We disagree with these conclusions. We demonstrate that volume entropy is inconsistent with the postulates of thermodynamics for systems with non-monotonic energy densities, while a definition of entropy based on the probability distributions of macroscopic variables does satisfy the postulates of thermodynamics. Our results confirm that negative temperature is a valid extension of thermodynamics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
