Verification of internal risk measure estimates
Mark H.A. Davis

TL;DR
This paper develops a framework for evaluating the correctness of internal risk measure estimates in real-time financial data, focusing on calibration, elicitability, and a data-driven algorithm for VaR estimation.
Contribution
It introduces a calibration concept for dynamic risk measures, analyzes properties of VaR and CVaR, and proposes a feedback algorithm for reliable VaR estimation.
Findings
VaR has unique properties not shared by other risk measures.
The proposed algorithm produces VaR estimates that pass calibration and independence tests.
CVaR estimators face challenges due to tail dependence.
Abstract
This paper concerns sequential computation of risk measures for financial data and asks how, given a risk measurement procedure, we can tell whether the answers it produces are `correct'. We draw the distinction between `external' and `internal' risk measures and concentrate on the latter, where we observe data in real time, make predictions and observe outcomes. It is argued that evaluation of such procedures is best addressed from the point of view of probability forecasting or Dawid's theory of `prequential statistics' [Dawid, JRSS(A)1984]. We introduce a concept of `calibration' of a risk measure in a dynamic setting, following the precepts of Dawid's weak and strong prequential principles, and examine its application to quantile forecasting (VaR -- value at risk) and to mean estimation (applicable to CVaR -- expected shortfall). The relationship between these ideas and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
