Systematic trend of water vapour absorption in red giant atmospheres revealed by high resolution TEXES 12 micron spectra
N. Ryde, J. Lambert, M. Farzone, M. J. Richter, E. Josselin, G.M., Harper, K. Eriksson, T. K. Greathouse

TL;DR
High-resolution mid-infrared spectra of red giants reveal water vapor absorption features that challenge the MOLsphere model, indicating more complex atmospheric structures and non-LTE effects in these stars.
Contribution
This study provides the first systematic high-resolution spectral analysis of water vapor in red giants, questioning the existence of large MOLspheres and highlighting the importance of non-LTE effects.
Findings
Water absorption lines are stronger than expected in stars cooler than 4300 K.
Line strengths vary smoothly with spectral type.
Water lines are formed in the photosphere, not in large molecular spheres.
Abstract
The structures of the outer atmospheres of red giants are very complex. The notion of large optically thick molecular spheres around the stars (MOLspheres) has been invoked in order to explain e.g. spectro-interferometric observations. However, high-resolution spectra in the mid-IR do not easily fit into this picture. They rule out any large sphere of water vapour in LTE surrounding red giants. Our aim here is to investigate high-resolution, mid-infrared spectra for a range of red giants, from early-K to mid M. We have recorded 12 microns spectra of 10 well-studied bright red giants, with TEXES on the IRTF. We find that all giants in our study cooler than 4300 K, spanning a range of effective temperatures, show water absorption lines stronger than expected. The strengths of the lines vary smoothly with spectral type. We identify several spectral features in the wavelength region that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
