The SAMI Galaxy Survey: Towards a unified dynamical scaling relation for galaxies of all types
L. Cortese, L. M. R. Fogarty, I.-T. Ho, K. Bekki, J. Bland-Hawthorn,, M. Colless, W. Couch, S. M. Croom, K. Glazebrook, J. Mould, N. Scott, R., Sharp, C. Tonini, J. T. Allen, J. Bloom, J. J. Bryant, M. Cluver, R. L., Davies, M. Drinkwater, M. Goodwin, A. Green, L. J. Kewley

TL;DR
This study demonstrates a universal dynamical scaling relation linking stellar mass to a combined velocity parameter for all galaxy types, using data from the SAMI Galaxy Survey, improving upon previous relations by incorporating both gas and stellar kinematics.
Contribution
It introduces a unified relation between stellar mass and a combined velocity parameter applicable to all galaxy morphologies, based on integral field spectroscopy data.
Findings
All 235 galaxies lie on a tight $M_{*}$-$S_{0.5}$ relation.
The $S_{0.5}$ parameter effectively combines dispersion and rotation.
The relation is valid across a wide stellar mass range and independent of galaxy morphology.
Abstract
We take advantage of the first data from the Sydney-AAO Multi-object Integral field (SAMI) Galaxy Survey to investigate the relation between the kinematics of gas and stars, and stellar mass in a comprehensive sample of nearby galaxies. We find that all 235 objects in our sample, regardless of their morphology, lie on a tight relation linking stellar mass () to internal velocity quantified by the parameter, which combines the contribution of both dispersion () and rotational velocity () to the dynamical support of a galaxy (). Our results are independent of the baryonic component from which and are estimated, as the of stars and gas agree remarkably well. This represents a significant improvement compared to the canonical vs. and vs. relations. Not…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
