Definable types in algebraically closed valued fields
Pablo Cubides-Kovacsics, Fran\c{c}oise Delon

TL;DR
This paper investigates the conditions under which types over algebraically closed valued fields are definable, revealing limitations of the property for higher types and exploring implications in C-minimality.
Contribution
It characterizes pairs of algebraically closed valued fields where all types over a base are definable, and constructs counterexamples showing the property does not extend to higher types.
Findings
All 1-types over certain algebraically closed valued fields are definable.
Counterexamples exist where higher types are not all definable.
Discussion on the implications in C-minimality.
Abstract
Marker and Steinhorn shown that given two models of an o-minimal theory, if all 1-types over realized in are definable, then all types over realized in are definable. In this article we characterize pairs of algebraically closed valued fields satisfying the same property. Although it is true that if is an algebraically closed valued field such that all 1-types over are definable then all types over definable, we build a counterexample for the relative statement, \textit{i.e.}, we show for any that there is a pair of algebraically closed valued fields such that all -types over realized in are definable but there is an -type over realized in which is not definable. Finally, we discuss what happens in the more general context of -minimality.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
