Di-Hadron Correlations with Identified Leading Hadrons in 200 GeV Au+Au and d+Au Collisions at STAR
STAR Collaboration: L. Adamczyk, J. K. Adkins, G. Agakishiev, M. M., Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, I. Alekseev, J. Alford, A. Aparin, D. Arkhipkin, E. C., Aschenauer, G. S. Averichev, A. Banerjee, R. Bellwied, A. Bhasin, A. K., Bhati, P. Bhattarai, J. Bielcik, J. Bielcikova, L. C. Bland

TL;DR
This study investigates di-hadron correlations with identified leading hadrons in 200 GeV Au+Au and d+Au collisions, revealing differences in jet-like yields and ridge phenomena that shed light on hadronization in the quark-gluon plasma.
Contribution
It provides the first two-dimensional di-hadron correlation measurements with identified leading hadrons in these collision systems, testing various hadronization models.
Findings
Enhanced jet-like yield for leading pions in Au+Au compared to d+Au.
No enhancement for leading non-pions (protons and kaons).
Higher correlated yield at large angles for leading non-pions.
Abstract
The STAR collaboration presents for the first time two-dimensional di-hadron correlations with identified leading hadrons in 200 GeV central Au+Au and minimum-bias d+Au collisions to explore hadronization mechanisms in the quark gluon plasma. The enhancement of the jet-like yield for leading pions in Au+Au data with respect to the d+Au reference and the absence of such an enhancement for leading non-pions (protons and kaons) are discussed within the context of a quark recombination scenario. The correlated yield at large angles, specifically in the \emph{ridge region}, is found to be significantly higher for leading non-pions than pions. The consistencies of the constituent quark scaling, azimuthal harmonic model and a mini-jet modification model description of the data are tested, providing further constraints on hadronization.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
