The spectroscopic Hertzsprung-Russell diagram of Galactic massive stars
N. Castro, L. Fossati, N. Langer, S. Sim\'on-D\'iaz, F. R. N., Schneider, R. G. Izzard

TL;DR
This study constructs the spectroscopic Hertzsprung-Russell diagram for nearly 600 Galactic massive stars using spectroscopic data, revealing insights into stellar evolution, core overshooting, and possible envelope inflation near the Eddington limit.
Contribution
First observational sHRD for Galactic massive stars derived from spectroscopic data, providing new insights into stellar evolution and structure.
Findings
Convective core overshooting may be mass-dependent and stronger at high masses.
Evidence for an empirical upper limit in the sHRD for certain temperature ranges.
Large number of stars below the upper limit possibly due to envelope inflation near the Eddington limit.
Abstract
The distribution of stars in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram narrates their evolutionary history and directly assesses their properties. Placing stars in this diagram however requires the knowledge of their distances and interstellar extinctions, which are often poorly known for Galactic stars. The spectroscopic Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (sHRD) tells similar evolutionary tales, but is independent of distance and extinction measurements. Based on spectroscopically derived effective temperatures and gravities of almost 600 stars, we derive for the first time the observational distribution of Galactic massive stars in the sHRD. While biases and statistical limitations in the data prevent detailed quantitative conclusions at this time, we see several clear qualitative trends. By comparing the observational sHRD with different state-of-the-art stellar evolutionary predictions, we conclude…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
