Importance of realistic mobility models for vanet network simulation
Bahidja Boukenadil

TL;DR
This paper highlights the critical impact of selecting realistic mobility models, like MOVE and CityMob, on the accuracy of VANET network simulation results, emphasizing the importance of real-world scenarios for protocol performance evaluation.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of two mobility models, MOVE and CityMob, demonstrating their influence on VANET simulation outcomes and stressing the need for realistic mobility modeling.
Findings
Mobility models significantly affect VANET simulation results.
Choosing realistic models improves protocol performance evaluation.
The study emphasizes scenario realism in VANET simulations.
Abstract
In the performance evaluation of a protocol for a vehicular ad hoc network, the protocol should be tested under a realistic conditions including, representative data traffic models, and realistic movements of the mobile nodes which are the vehicles (i.e., a mobility model). This work is a comparative study between two mobility models that are used in the simulations of vehicular networks, i.e., MOVE (MObility model generator for VEhicular networks) and CityMob, a mobility pattern generator for VANET. We describe several mobility models for VANET simulations. In this paper we aim to show that the mobility models can significantly affect the simulation results in VANET networks. The results presented in this article prove the importance of choosing a suitable real world scenario for performances studies of routing protocols in this kind of network.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
