An approach to the author citation potential: Measures of scientific performance which are invariant across scientific fields

TL;DR

This paper introduces new measures of an individual author's citation potential that account for disciplinary differences, using production, impact, and reference dimensions, and demonstrates their effectiveness in comparing authors across fields.

Contribution

It proposes novel author-level citation potential measures based on research dimensions, improving cross-disciplinary comparisons and reducing variance among groups.

Findings

The ratio of production to impact effectively normalizes citation potential.

The measure reduces between-group variance more than other indicators.

It aligns with existing journal impact metrics.

Abstract

The citation potential is a measure of the probability of being cited. Obviously, it is different among fields of science, social science, and humanities because of systematic differences in publication and citation behaviour across disciplines. In the past, the citation potential was studied at journal level considering the average number of references in established groups of journals (for example, the crown indicator is based on the journal subject categories in the Web of Science database). In this paper, some characterizations of the author's scientific research through three different research dimensions are proposed: production (journal papers), impact (journal citations), and reference (bibliographical sources). Then, we propose different measures of the citation potential for authors based on a proportion of these dimensions. An empirical application, in a set of 120 randomly selected highly productive authors from the CSIC Research Centre (Spain) in four subject areas, shows that the ratio between production and impact dimensions is a normalized measure of the citation potential at the level of individual authors. Moreover, this ratio reduces the between-group variance in relation to the within-group variance in a higher proportion than the rest of the indicators analysed. Furthermore, it is consistent with the type of journal impact indicator used. A possible application of this result is in the selection and promotion process within interdisciplinary institutions, since it allows comparisons of authors based on their particular scientific research.