Validation of the Geant4 simulation of bremsstrahlung from thick targets below 3 MeV
Luciano Pandola, Claudio Andenna, Barbara Caccia

TL;DR
This study validates Geant4 Monte Carlo simulations of bremsstrahlung spectra from thick targets below 3 MeV, showing good agreement with experimental data and highlighting the strengths and limitations of different physics models for medical physics applications.
Contribution
The paper provides a comprehensive validation of Geant4 electromagnetic models against experimental bremsstrahlung data for various targets and energies, identifying the most accurate models and their limitations.
Findings
Geant4 accurately reproduces spectral shapes and forward photon emission within 10-30%.
The Penelope-based physics model shows slightly better agreement with experimental data.
All models overestimate backward hemisphere emission and underestimate photon yield at 70 keV for high-Z targets.
Abstract
The bremsstrahlung spectra produced by electrons impinging on thick targets are simulated using the Geant4 Monte Carlo toolkit. Simulations are validated against experimental data available in literature for a range of energy between 0.5 and 2.8 MeV for Al and Fe targets and for a value of energy of 70keV for Al, Ag, W and Pb targets. All three independent sets of electromagnetic models available in Geant4 to simulate bremsstrahlung are tested. A quantitative analysis is performed reproducing with each model the energy spectrum for the different configurations of emission angles, energies and targets. At higher energies (0.5-2.8 MeV) of the impinging electrons on Al and Fe targets, Geant4 is able to reproduce the spectral shapes and the integral photon emission in the forward direction. The agreement is within 10-30%, depending on energy, emission angle and target material. The physics…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
