Including birefringence into time evolution of CMB: current and future constraints
Giulia Gubitosi, Matteo Martinelli, Luca Pagano

TL;DR
This paper investigates how birefringence affects CMB polarization evolution, constrains its effects with current data, and forecasts future sensitivity, highlighting potential degeneracies with lensing effects.
Contribution
It introduces models of birefringence effects during CMB propagation and assesses their detectability with current and future experiments.
Findings
Current data cannot distinguish birefringence effects from standard procedures.
Forecasts show Planck and PolarBear can detect non-zero birefringence angles.
Degeneracies between birefringence and lensing may lead to false detections.
Abstract
We introduce birefringence effects within the propagation history of CMB, considering the two cases of a constant effect and of an effect that increases linearly in time, as the rotation of polarization induced by birefringence accumulates during photon propagation. Both cases result into a mixing of E and B modes before lensing effects take place, thus leading to the fact that lensing is acting on spectra that are already mixed because of birefringence. Moreover, if the polarization rotation angle increases during propagation, birefringence affects more the large scales that the small scales. We put constraints on the two cases using data from WMAP 9yr and BICEP 2013 and compare these results with the constraints obtained when the usual procedure of rotating the final power spectra is adopted, finding that this dataset combination is unable to distinguish between effects, but it…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
