New PARSEC evolutionary tracks of massive stars at low metallicity: testing canonical stellar evolution in nearby star forming dwarf galaxies
Jing Tang, Alessandro Bressan, Philip Rosenfield, Alessandra Slemer,, Paola Marigo, L\'eo Girardi, Luciana Bianchi

TL;DR
This paper extends the PARSEC stellar evolution models to massive stars at low metallicity, testing their predictions against observations of dwarf galaxies and exploring the impact of overshooting on stellar evolution features.
Contribution
The study introduces new low-metallicity massive star models with updated physics and examines the effects of overshooting on stellar evolutionary tracks and observed color-magnitude diagrams.
Findings
Models reproduce observed CMDs fairly well.
Blue loop predictions are too cool with canonical overshooting.
Enhanced overshooting improves agreement with observations.
Abstract
We extend the {\sl\,PARSEC} library of stellar evolutionary tracks by computing new models of massive stars, from 14\Msun to 350\Msun. The input physics is the same used in the {\sl\,PARSEC}~V1.1 version, but for the mass-loss rate which is included by considering the most recent updates in literature. We focus on low metallicity, =0.001 and =0.004, for which the metal poor dwarf irregular star forming galaxies, Sextans A, WLM and NCG6822, provide simple but powerful workbenches. The models reproduce fairly well the observed CMDs but the stellar colour distributions indicate that the predicted blue loop is not hot enough in models with canonical extent of overshooting. In the framework of a mild extended mixing during central hydrogen burning, the only way to reconcile the discrepancy is to enhance the overshooting at the base of the convective envelope (EO) during the first…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
