There are no two non-real conjugates of a Pisot number with the same imaginary part
Art\=uras Dubickas, Kevin G. Hare, Jonas Jankauskas

TL;DR
This paper proves uniqueness and non-existence results for additive relations among conjugates of Pisot numbers, showing specific configurations are impossible or unique, thereby deepening understanding of their algebraic properties.
Contribution
It establishes the uniqueness of a specific Pisot number with a four-term additive relation among conjugates and proves the non-existence of certain other additive relations.
Findings
The number b1=(1+\u221a{3+27;7;5})/2 is the only Pisot number with four conjugates satisfying \u03b1_1+7;7;7;7;=7;7;7;7;+7;7;7;7;.
The paper shows no two non-real conjugates of a Pisot number can have the same imaginary part.
It proves that roots of Siegel's polynomial are the only solutions to 7;7;7;+7;7;7;+7;7;7;=0 in conjugates of Pisot numbers.
Abstract
We show that the number with minimal polynomial is the only Pisot number whose four distinct conjugates satisfy the additive relation . This implies that there exists no two non-real conjugates of a Pisot number with the same imaginary part and also that at most two conjugates of a Pisot number can have the same real part. On the other hand, we prove that similar four term equations or cannot be solved in conjugates of a Pisot number . We also show that the roots of the Siegel's polynomial are the only solutions to the three term equation in conjugates of a Pisot number. Finally, we prove that there exists no Pisot number whose…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Dynamics and Fractals · semigroups and automata theory · History and Theory of Mathematics
