Stellar Kinematics and Structural Properties of Virgo Cluster Dwarf Early-Type Galaxies from the SMAKCED Project II. The Survey and a Systematic Analysis of Kinematic Anomalies and Asymmetries
E. Toloba, P. Guhathakurta, R. Peletier, A. Boselli, T. Lisker, J., Falcon-Barroso, J. Simon, G. van de Ven, S. Paudel, E. Emsellem, J. Janz, M., den Brok, J. Gorgas, G. Hensler, E. Laurikainen, S. M. Niemi, A. Rys, H. Salo

TL;DR
This study provides detailed kinematic and stellar population analyses of Virgo cluster dwarf early-type galaxies, revealing frequent rotation curve anomalies, diverse ages and metallicities, and insights into their mass and dark matter content.
Contribution
It offers a systematic analysis of kinematic anomalies and asymmetries in dwarf early-type galaxies, linking photometric and kinematic properties for the first time in this context.
Findings
62% of dEs show significant rotation curve anomalies
Most galaxies exhibit photometric anomalies with no clear correlation to kinematic anomalies
Median dark matter fraction within Re is approximately 46%
Abstract
We present spatially resolved kinematics and global stellar populations and mass-to-light ratios for a sample of 39 dwarf early-type (dE) galaxies in the Virgo cluster studied as part of the SMAKCED stellar absorption-line spectroscopy and imaging survey. This sample is representative of the early-type population in the absolute magnitude range -19.0 < M_r < -16.0. For each dE, we measure the rotation curve and velocity dispersion profile and fit an analytic function to the rotation curve. We study the significance of the departure of the rotation curve from the best fit analytic function (poorly fit) and of the difference between the approaching and receding sides of the rotation curve (asymmetry). We find that 62 +/- 8 % (23 out of the 39) of the dEs have a significant anomaly in their rotation curve. Analysis of the images reveals photometric anomalies for most galaxies. However,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
