The pseudo-Anosov and conjugacy problems are in $\textbf{NP} \cap \textbf{co-NP}$
Mark C. Bell

TL;DR
This paper proves that the problems of identifying pseudo-Anosov mapping classes and conjugacy of mapping classes are in NP and co-NP, providing polynomial bounds and exponential time algorithms for these problems.
Contribution
It establishes the NP and co-NP complexity classifications for the pseudo-Anosov and conjugacy problems, with polynomial bounds on splitting sequences.
Findings
Deciding pseudo-Anosov mapping classes is in NP.
Deciding conjugacy of mapping classes is in co-NP.
Provides exponential time algorithms based on polynomial bounds.
Abstract
For a fixed marked surface , we construct polynomial bounds on the periodic and preperiodic lengths of the maximal splitting sequences of a projectively invariant measured train track. We give two consequences of these bounds. Firstly, that the problem of deciding whether a mapping class is pseudo-Anosov lies in . This is dual to the previously known result that the pseudo-Anosov problem is in . Secondly, that the problem of deciding whether two mapping classes are conjugate lies in . Similarly, this is the dual to the previously known result that the conjugacy problem is in . As usual, in both cases we immediately obtain exponential time solutions to these problems. A version of these algorithms have been implemented as part of flipper.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Algorithms and Data Compression · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
