redMaPPer IV: Photometric Membership Identification of Cluster Galaxies with 1% Precision
Eduardo Rozo (U. of Arizona), Eli S. Rykoff (SLAC), Matthew Becker, (Stanford), Rachel M. Reddick (Stanford), Risa H. Wechsler (Stanford)

TL;DR
This paper validates and corrects the redMaPPer photometric cluster membership probabilities, achieving approximately 1% accuracy, and analyzes the impact of projection effects and systematic biases using SDSS and GAMA data.
Contribution
It introduces corrections for systematic biases in redMaPPer probabilities and demonstrates near-perfect agreement with spectroscopic data, enhancing photometric cluster membership accuracy.
Findings
Photometric membership probabilities agree with spectroscopic rates within 1%.
Systematic biases from blue galaxies, line-of-sight structure, and photometric noise are identified and corrected.
Projection effects contribute about 6% to cluster richness.
Abstract
In order to study the galaxy population of galaxy clusters with photometric data one must be able to accurately discriminate between cluster members and non-members. The redMaPPer cluster finding algorithm treats this problem probabilistically. Here, we utilize SDSS and GAMA spectroscopic membership rates to validate the redMaPPer membership probability estimates for clusters with . We find small - but correctable - biases, sourced by three different systematics. The first two were expected a priori, namely blue cluster galaxies and correlated structure along the line of sight. The third systematic is new: the redMaPPer template fitting exhibits a non-trivial dependence on photometric noise, which biases the original redMaPPer probabilities when utilizing noisy data. After correcting for these effects, we find exquisite agreement () between the photometric…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
