The Murchison Widefield Array Commissioning Survey: A Low-Frequency Catalogue of 14,110 Compact Radio Sources over 6,100 Square Degrees
Natasha Hurley-Walker, John Morgan, Randall B. Wayth, Paul J. Hancock,, Martin E. Bell, Gianni Bernardi, Ramesh Bhat, Frank Briggs, Avinash A., Deshpande, Aaron Ewall-Wice, Lu Feng, Bryna J. Hazelton, Luke Hindson, Daniel, C. Jacobs, David L. Kaplan Nadia Kudryavtseva, Emil Lenc

TL;DR
The paper presents a comprehensive low-frequency radio sky survey covering over 6,100 square degrees, cataloging more than 14,000 sources with detailed flux and spectral data, achieved during the Murchison Widefield Array's commissioning phase.
Contribution
It provides the first large-scale, low-frequency radio source catalog from the Murchison Widefield Array commissioning data, including detailed source measurements and a novel data reduction approach.
Findings
Catalog of 14,110 sources with flux and spectral index
Coverage of 6,100 square degrees at 104--196 MHz
Resolution of 3 arcmin with 40 mJy/beam sensitivity
Abstract
We present the results of an approximately 6,100 square degree 104--196MHz radio sky survey performed with the Murchison Widefield Array during instrument commissioning between 2012 September and 2012 December: the Murchison Widefield Array Commissioning Survey (MWACS). The data were taken as meridian drift scans with two different 32-antenna sub-arrays that were available during the commissioning period. The survey covers approximately 20.5 h < Right Ascension (RA) < 8.5 h, -58 deg < Declination (Dec) < -14 deg over three frequency bands centred on 119, 150 and 180 MHz, with image resolutions of 6--3 arcmin. The catalogue has 3-arcmin angular resolution and a typical noise level of 40 mJy/beam, with reduced sensitivity near the field boundaries and bright sources. We describe the data reduction strategy, based upon mosaiced snapshots, flux density calibration and source-finding method.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
