Could Gaussian regenerative stations act as quantum repeaters?
Ryo Namiki, Oleg Gittsovich, Saikat Guha, Norbert L\"utkenhaus

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether Gaussian regenerative stations can function as quantum repeaters for long-distance quantum key distribution, concluding that all bosonic Gaussian channels are unsuitable for this purpose.
Contribution
It proves that all bosonic Gaussian channels, including various optical amplifiers, cannot serve as effective quantum repeaters for QKD, and identifies conditions that break entanglement in Gaussian relays.
Findings
Bosonic Gaussian channels are not useful as QKD repeaters.
Gaussian relays can render channels entanglement breaking.
The study delineates conditions under which Gaussian relays fail for QKD.
Abstract
Higher transmission loss diminishes the performance of optical communication|be it the rate at which classical or quantum data can be sent reliably, or the secure key generation rate of quantum key distribution (QKD). Loss compounds with distance|exponentially in an optical fiber, and inverse-square with distance for a free-space channel. In order to boost classical communication rates over long distances, it is customary to introduce regenerative relays at intermediate points along the channel. It is therefore natural to speculate whether untended regenerative stations, such as phase-insensitive or phase-sensitive optical amplifiers, could serve as repeaters for long-distance QKD. The primary result of this paper rules out all bosonic Gaussian channels to be useful as QKD repeaters, which include phase-insensitive and phase-sensitive amplifiers as special cases, for any QKD protocol.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
