The right-hand side of the Jacobi identity: to be naught or not to be?
Arthemy V. Kiselev

TL;DR
This paper investigates the conditions under which the variational Schouten bracket satisfies the Jacobi identity, clarifying the role of the BV-Laplacian and introducing a geometric calculus approach to address analytic difficulties in gauge theory quantization.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the graded Jacobi identity for the variational Schouten bracket holds when using Gel'fand's calculus, contrasting with previous methods that failed to ensure the BV-Laplacian's derivation property.
Findings
The Jacobi identity holds with Gel'fand's calculus approach.
Old methods can produce non-zero cohomology representatives.
Counterexample shows failure of BV-Laplacian as a derivation without Gel'fand's calculus.
Abstract
The geometric approach [1312.1262] to iterated variations of local functionals -- e.g., of the (master-)action functional -- resulted in an extension of the deformation quantisation technique to the set-up of Poisson models of field theory [IHES/M/15/13]. It also allowed of a rigorous proof ([1312.1262],[1210.0726]) for the main inter-relations between the Batalin-Vilkovisky (BV) Laplacian and variational Schouten bracket. The ad hoc use of these relations had been a known analytic difficulty in the BV-formalism for quantisation of gauge systems; now achieved, the proof does actually not require the assumption of graded-commutativity [1210.0726]. Explained in our previous work, geometry's self-regularisation is rendered by Gel'fand's calculus of singular linear integral operators supported on the diagonal. We now illustrate that analytic technique by inspecting the validity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
