$(n,m)$-Fold Covers of Spheres
Imre B\'ar\'any, Ruy Fabila-Monroy, Birgit Vogtenhuber

TL;DR
This paper investigates the minimal number of open sets needed to cover a sphere multiple times without antipodal pairs, providing bounds based on the sphere's dimension and coverage multiplicity.
Contribution
It establishes new bounds on the number of sets required for multiple coverings of spheres with antipodal constraints, extending classical Borsuk-Ulam related results.
Findings
Lower and upper bounds for open covers with multiple coverings
Exact number of sets needed for specific coverage scenarios
Existence of points with high coverage in multiple covers
Abstract
A well known consequence of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem is that if the -dimensional sphere is covered with less than open sets, then there is a set containing a pair of antipodal points. In this paper we provide lower and upper bounds on the minimum number of open sets, not containing a pair of antipodal points, needed to cover the -dimensional sphere times, with the additional property that the northern hemisphere is covered times. We prove that if the open northern hemisphere is to be covered times then at least and at most sets are needed. For the case of and , this number is equal to if and equal to if . If the closed northern hemisphere is to be covered times then…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
