Extending the supernova Hubble diagram to z~1.5 with the Euclid space mission
P. Astier, C. Balland, M. Brescia, E. Cappellaro, R. G. Carlberg, S., Cavuoti, M. Della Valle, E. Gangler, A. Goobar, J. Guy, D. Hardin, I. M., Hook, R. Kessler, A. Kim, E. Linder, G. Longo, K. Maguire, F. Mannucci, S., Mattila, R. Nichol, R. Pain, N. Regnault, S. Spiro

TL;DR
This paper forecasts how the Euclid space mission can extend the supernova Hubble diagram to redshift ~1.5, improving dark energy constraints through simulated surveys and systematic uncertainty analysis.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive simulation of supernova surveys combining ground and space data to forecast dark energy constraints with Euclid.
Findings
Constraints on dark energy parameters are competitive, with sigma(w)=0.022.
The survey achieves a Dark Energy Task Force figure of merit of 203.
Euclid can extend the supernova Hubble diagram to z~1.5, enhancing cosmological measurements.
Abstract
We forecast dark energy constraints that could be obtained from a new large sample of Type Ia supernovae where those at high redshift are acquired with the Euclid space mission. We simulate a three-prong SN survey: a z<0.35 nearby sample (8000 SNe), a 0.2<z<0.95 intermediate sample (8800 SNe), and a 0.75<z<1.55 high-z sample (1700 SNe). The nearby and intermediate surveys are assumed to be conducted from the ground, while the high-z is a joint ground- and space-based survey. This latter survey, the "Dark Energy Supernova Infra-Red Experiment" (DESIRE), is designed to fit within 6 months of Euclid observing time, with a dedicated observing program. We simulate the SN events as they would be observed in rolling-search mode by the various instruments, and derive the quality of expected cosmological constraints. We account for known systematic uncertainties, in particular calibration…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
