Reclaiming human machine nature
Didier Fass (LORIA)

TL;DR
This paper discusses the evolution of human-machine systems, critiques the reductionist cognitive paradigm, and advocates for a renewed epistemological framework to better integrate biological, social, and technological aspects of human augmentation.
Contribution
It proposes a new epistemological approach to human systems design that moves beyond the traditional cognitive model and incorporates biological and social dimensions.
Findings
Current models reduce humans to cognitive functions.
Biological and social boundaries are blurred in modern systems.
A new framework is needed for future human-machine integration.
Abstract
Extending and modifying his domain of life by artifact production is one of the main characteristics of humankind. From the first hominid, who used a wood stick or a stone for extending his upper limbs and augmenting his gesture strength, to current systems engineers who used technologies for augmenting human cognition, perception and action, extending human body capabilities remains a big issue. From more than fifty years cybernetics, computer and cognitive sciences have imposed only one reductionist model of human machine systems: cognitive systems. Inspired by philosophy, behaviorist psychology and the information treatment metaphor, the cognitive system paradigm requires a function view and a functional analysis in human systems design process. According that design approach, human have been reduced to his metaphysical and functional properties in a new dualism. Human body…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
