Prospects for joint gravitational wave and short gamma-ray burst observations
J. Clark, H. Evans, S. Fairhurst, I. W. Harry, E. Macdonald, D., Macleod, P. J. Sutton, A. R. Williamson

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the expected rates of joint gravitational wave and short gamma-ray burst observations, highlighting the potential for increased detection sensitivity and the importance of detector network evolution and progenitor characteristics.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of how joint observations can improve detection sensitivity and constrain gamma-ray burst progenitor models using upcoming gravitational wave detector data.
Findings
25% increase in GW detection sensitivity when using GRB information
High likelihood of joint detections as detectors reach design sensitivity
Joint observations can help estimate gamma-ray burst jet opening angles
Abstract
We present a detailed evaluation of the expected rate of joint gravitational-wave and short gamma-ray burst (GRB) observations over the coming years. We begin by evaluating the improvement in distance sensitivity of the gravitational wave search that arises from using the GRB observation to restrict the time and sky location of the source. We argue that this gives a 25% increase in sensitivity when compared to an all-sky, all-time search, corresponding to more than doubling the number of detectable gravitational wave signals associated with GRBs. Using this, we present the expected rate of joint observations with the advanced LIGO and Virgo instruments, taking into account the expected evolution of the gravitational wave detector network. We show that in the early advanced gravitational wave detector observing runs, from 2015-2017, there is only a small chance of a joint observation.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
