Resource-Constrained Adaptive Search for Sparse Multi-Class Targets with Varying Importance

TL;DR

This paper develops adaptive sensing policies for sparse multi-class target detection that account for varying importance and multiple sensor types, achieving near-oracle performance and outperforming previous methods.

Contribution

It introduces new optimization policies for resource allocation in multi-class sparse target sensing, considering different sensor models and target importance levels.

Findings

Policies perform within 3 dB of the oracle bound at high SNR.

Proposed methods reduce estimation error and misclassification probability.

Sensor model combinations yield similar performance with easier implementation.

Abstract

In sparse target inference problems it has been shown that significant gains can be achieved by adaptive sensing using convex criteria. We generalize previous work on adaptive sensing to (a) include multiple classes of targets with different levels of importance and (b) accommodate multiple sensor models. New optimization policies are developed to allocate a limited resource budget to simultaneously locate, classify and estimate a sparse number of targets embedded in a large space. Upper and lower bounds on the performance of the proposed policies are derived by analyzing a baseline policy, which allocates resources uniformly across the scene, and an oracle policy which has a priori knowledge of the target locations/classes. These bounds quantify analytically the potential benefit of adaptive sensing as a function of target frequency and importance. Numerical results indicate that the proposed policies perform close to the oracle bound (<3dB) when signal quality is sufficiently high (e.g.~performance within 3 dB for SNR above 15 dB). Moreover, the proposed policies improve on previous policies in terms of reducing estimation error, reducing misclassification probability, and increasing expected return. To account for sensors with different levels of agility, three sensor models are considered: global adaptive (GA), which can allocate different amounts of resource to each location in the space; global uniform (GU), which can allocate resources uniformly across the scene; and local adaptive (LA), which can allocate fixed units to a subset of locations. Policies that use a mixture of GU and LA sensors are shown to perform similarly to those that use GA sensors while being more easily implementable.