Bell Inequalities for Continuously Emitting Sources
Emanuel Knill, Scott Glancy, Sae Woo Nam, Kevin Coakley, Yanbao Zhang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new family of Bell inequalities based on distance measures between recorded timetags, addressing the coincidence loophole caused by timing jitter in experiments with continuously emitted entangled photon pairs.
Contribution
The authors develop distance-based Bell inequalities that are robust against timing jitter and settings-dependent errors, improving the reliability of non-classical correlation tests.
Findings
Bell inequalities based on signed, directed distances can unambiguously demonstrate non-classical correlations.
The method improves the signal-to-noise ratio in Bell tests with continuous photon streams.
Systematic modifications of Bell functions enhance the significance of violations.
Abstract
A common experimental strategy for demonstrating non-classical correlations is to show violation of a Bell inequality by measuring a continuously emitted stream of entangled photon pairs. The measurements involve the detection of photons by two spatially separated parties. The detection times are recorded and compared to quantify the violation. The violation critically depends on determining which detections are coincident. Because the recorded detection times have "jitter", coincidences cannot be inferred perfectly. In the presence of settings-dependent timing errors, this can allow a local-realistic system to show apparent violation--the so-called "coincidence loophole". Here we introduce a family of Bell inequalities based on signed, directed distances between the parties' sequences of recorded timetags. Given that the timetags are recorded for synchronized, fixed observation periods…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
