Population pressure and global markets drive a decade of forest cover change in Africa's Albertine Rift

TL;DR

This study analyzes how population growth and market dynamics influence forest cover changes in Africa's Albertine Rift, revealing that national demographic and economic factors are primary drivers of deforestation and reforestation patterns.

Contribution

It provides a multilevel analysis linking national population and market data with local forest change, highlighting the dominant role of demographic and economic forces.

Findings

Population doubling predicts 2.06% annual forest loss.

Tea production doubling causes 1.90% forest loss.

Increased cassava production correlates with forest gain.

Abstract

The Albertine Rift region faces rapid human population growth, while being a biodiversity hotspot. Using satellite-derived continuous forest cover change data, we examined national socioeconomic, demographic, and agricultural production data, and local demographic and geographic variables to assess multilevel forces driving significant local forest cover loss and gain outside protected areas during the first decade of this century. Because the processes that drive forest cover loss and gain are expected to be different, we constructed models of change in each direction. Although forest cover change varied by country, national level population change was the strongest driver of forest loss rate for all countries, with a population doubling predicted to cause 2.06 percent annual cover loss, while doubling tea production was predicted to cause 1.90 percent. The rate of forest cover gain was associated positively with increased production of the local staple crop cassava, but negatively with local population density and meat production, suggesting production drivers at multiple levels mitigate reforestation. We found a small, but significant, decrease of forest cover loss rate with increasing distance from protected areas, supporting studies suggesting higher rates of landscape change near protected areas. While local population density mitigated the rate of forest cover gain, cover loss also correlated to lower local population density, an apparent paradox, but consistent with findings that larger scale forces outweigh local drivers of deforestation. This implicates demographic and market forces at national and international scales as critical drivers of change, calling into question the necessary scale of forest protection policy in this biodiversity hotspot.