Partisan Sharing: Facebook Evidence and Societal Consequences
Jisun An, Daniele Quercia, Jon Crowcroft

TL;DR
This study investigates partisan sharing on Facebook, confirming its existence and variability, and reveals its societal impacts, including distorted perceptions but also increased political engagement among users.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence of partisan sharing behavior on Facebook, explores its dynamics over time and among different individuals, and links it to societal consequences through a controlled experiment.
Findings
Strong evidence of partisan sharing on Facebook.
Partisan sharing varies with individual interest and over time.
It leads to distorted perceptions but increases political knowledge and voting likelihood.
Abstract
The hypothesis of selective exposure assumes that people seek out information that supports their views and eschew information that conflicts with their beliefs, and that has negative consequences on our society. Few researchers have recently found counter evidence of selective exposure in social media: users are exposed to politically diverse articles. No work has looked at what happens after exposure, particularly how individuals react to such exposure, though. Users might well be exposed to diverse articles but share only the partisan ones. To test this, we study partisan sharing on Facebook: the tendency for users to predominantly share like-minded news articles and avoid conflicting ones. We verified four main hypotheses. That is, whether partisan sharing: 1) exists at all; 2) changes across individuals (e.g., depending on their interest in politics); 3) changes over time (e.g.,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
