A mass threshold in the number density of passive galaxies at z$\sim$2
V. Sommariva (1), A. Fontana (1), A. Lamastra (1), P. Santini (1), J., S. Dunlop (3), M. Nonino (2), M. Castellano (1), H. Ferguson (4), R. J., McLure (3), A. Galametz (1), M. Giavalisco (5), A. Grazian (1), Y. Lu (6), N., Menci (1), A. Merson (7), D. Paris (1)

TL;DR
This study reveals a mass threshold at around 10^{10.8} solar masses for passive galaxies at z~2, showing a decline in their number density below this mass, challenging current galaxy formation models.
Contribution
It provides the first robust evidence of a real turn-over in the number counts of quiescent galaxies at faint magnitudes, indicating a mass-dependent quenching mechanism at high redshift.
Findings
Number counts of quiescent galaxies flatten and decline below Ks~22.
A stellar mass threshold of approximately 10^{10.8} M_sun is identified.
Current semi-analytic models do not match observed number densities.
Abstract
The process that quenched star formation in galaxies at intermediate and high redshift is still the subject of considerable debate. One way to investigate this puzzling issue is to study the number density of quiescent galaxies at z~2, and its dependence on mass. Here we present the results of a new study based on very deep Ks-band imaging (with the HAWK-I instrument on the VLT) of two HST CANDELS fields (the UKIDSS Ultra-deep survey (UDS) field and GOODS-South). The new HAWK-I data (taken as part of the HUGS VLT Large Program) reach detection limits of Ks>26 (AB mag). We select a sample of passively-evolving galaxies in the redshift range 1.4<z<2.5. Thanks to the depth and large area coverage of our imaging, we have been able to extend the selection of quiescent galaxies a magnitude fainter than previous analyses. Through extensive simulations we demonstrate, for the first time, that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
