A unified approach to time consistency of dynamic risk measures and dynamic performance measures in discrete time
Tomasz R. Bielecki, Igor Cialenco, Marcin Pitera

TL;DR
This paper introduces a flexible, unified framework for analyzing the time consistency of dynamic risk and performance measures, enabling comprehensive comparison and synthesis of existing concepts through a novel update rule approach.
Contribution
It develops a general, adaptable framework that unifies various forms of time consistency in dynamic measures using minimal assumptions and a new update rule methodology.
Findings
Framework unifies multiple types of time consistency
Novel update rule effectively captures weak time consistency
Allows for in-depth comparative analysis of dynamic measures
Abstract
In this paper we provide a flexible framework allowing for a unified study of time consistency of risk measures and performance measures (also known as acceptability indices). The proposed framework not only integrates existing forms of time consistency, but also provides a comprehensive toolbox for analysis and synthesis of the concept of time consistency in decision making. In particular, it allows for in depth comparative analysis of (most of) the existing types of time consistency -- a feat that has not be possible before and which is done in the companion paper [BCP2016] to this one. In our approach the time consistency is studied for a large class of maps that are postulated to satisfy only two properties -- monotonicity and locality. The time consistency is defined in terms of an update rule. The form of the update rule introduced here is novel, and is perfectly suited for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational Drug Discovery Methods · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
