Obstruction criteria for modular deformation problems
Jeffrey Hatley

TL;DR
This paper refines obstruction criteria for modular deformation problems, removing previous restrictions and establishing conditions linking unobstructed deformations to level congruences of newforms.
Contribution
It improves bounds on primes for unobstructed deformation problems and removes the squarefree level restriction, also relating unobstructed deformations to congruences with lower level forms.
Findings
Explicit bounds on primes outside which deformation problems are unobstructed.
Removal of the squarefree level hypothesis in previous results.
Unobstructed deformation implies no congruence to lower level newforms.
Abstract
For a newform of weight and a prime of , the deformation problem for its associated mod Galois representation is unobstructed for all primes outside some finite set. Previous results gave an explicit bound on this finite set for of squarefree level; we modify this bound and remove the squarefree hypothesis. We also show that if the -adic deformation problem for is unobstructed, then is not congruent mod to a newform of lower level.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
