Planck intermediate results. XXXII. The relative orientation between the magnetic field and structures traced by interstellar dust
Planck Collaboration: R. Adam, P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. I. R., Alves, M. Arnaud, D. Arzoumanian, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A., J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, E. Battaner, K. Benabed, A., Benoit-L\'evy, J.-P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz

TL;DR
This study uses Planck polarization data to analyze the orientation of interstellar dust structures relative to magnetic fields, revealing a preferential alignment that varies with density and polarization fraction, informing models of ISM structure formation.
Contribution
The paper introduces a new algorithm to estimate the orientation of interstellar dust structures and compares magnetic field directions with these structures across different densities and polarization levels.
Findings
Ridges are generally aligned with magnetic fields, especially at higher polarization fractions.
Alignment decreases with increasing column density, indicating different formation mechanisms.
Structures in molecular complexes can be perpendicular to magnetic fields, challenging simple projection models.
Abstract
The role of the magnetic field in the formation of the filamentary structures observed in the interstellar medium (ISM) is a debated topic. The Planck all-sky maps of linearly polarized emission from dust at 353GHz provide the required combination of imaging and statistics to study the correlation between the structures of the Galactic magnetic field and of interstellar matter, both in the diffuse ISM and in molecular clouds. The data reveal structures, or ridges, in the intensity map with counterparts in the Stokes Q and/or U maps. We focus on structures at intermediate and high Galactic latitudes with column density from to cm. We measure the magnetic field orientation on the plane of the sky from the polarization data, and present an algorithm to estimate the orientation of the ridges from the dust intensity map. We use analytical models to account for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
