Metriplectic Algebra for Dissipative Fluids in Lagrangian Formulation

TL;DR

This paper reformulates the metriplectic algebra for dissipative fluids within the Lagrangian framework, clarifying the roles of entropy and Hamiltonian in describing irreversible and reversible dynamics at a microscopic level.

Contribution

It extends the metriplectic algebra to Lagrangian variables, enabling analysis of dissipative fluids in a framework closer to discrete systems and microscopic degrees of freedom.

Findings

Constructed the full metriplectic algebra in Lagrangian variables.

Clarified the role of entropy as a Casimir related to microscopic degrees of freedom.

Facilitated application of the framework in systems where Lagrangian formulation is preferred.

Abstract

It is known that the dynamics of dissipative fluids in Eulerian variables can be derived from an algebra of Leibniz brackets of observables, the metriplectic algebra, that extends the Poisson algebra of the zero viscosity limit via a symmetric, semidefinite component. This metric bracket generates dissipative forces. The metriplectic algebra includes the conserved total Hamiltonian $H$, generating the non-dissipative part of dynamics, and the entropy $S$ of those microscopic degrees of freedom draining energy irreversibly, that generates dissipation. This $S$ is a Casimir of the Poisson algebra to which the metriplectic algebra reduces in the frictionless limit. In the present paper, the metriplectic framework for viscous fluids is re-written in the Lagrangian Formulation, where the system is described through material variables: this is a way to describe the continuum much closer to the discrete system dynamics than the Eulerian fields. Accordingly, the full metriplectic algebra is constructed in material variables, and this will render it possible to apply it in all those cases in which the Lagrangian Formulation is preferred. The role of the entropy $S$ of a metriplectic system is as paramount as that of the Hamiltonian $H$, but this fact may be underestimated in the Eulerian formulation because $S$ is not the only Casimir of the symplectic non-canonical part of the algebra. Instead, when the dynamics of the non-ideal fluid is written through the parcel variables of the Lagrangian formulation, the fact that entropy is symplectically invariant appears to be more clearly related to its dependence on the microscopic degrees of freedom of the fluid, that do not participate at all to the symplectic canonical part of the algebra (which, indeed, involves and evolves only the macroscopic degrees of freedom of the fluid parcel).