The MOSDEF Survey: Optical AGN Diagnostics at z~2.3
Alison L. Coil, James Aird, Naveen Reddy, Alice E. Shapley, Mariska, Kriek, Brian Siana, Bahram Mobasher, William R. Freeman, Sedona H. Price,, Irene Shivaei

TL;DR
This study evaluates optical AGN diagnostics at z~2.3 using the MOSDEF survey, confirming the effectiveness of the BPT diagram while highlighting limitations and biases in AGN selection at high redshift.
Contribution
It demonstrates the continued utility of the BPT diagram for AGN identification at z~2.3 and analyzes the biases and limitations of other diagnostic methods and selection techniques.
Findings
BPT diagram effectively identifies AGN at z~2.3.
MEx diagram fails to identify all BPT-selected AGN.
Optically-selected AGN samples are incomplete at high redshift.
Abstract
We present results from the MOSFIRE Deep Evolution Field (MOSDEF) survey on rest-frame optical AGN identification and completeness at z~2.3. With our sample of 50 galaxies and 10 X-ray and IR-selected AGN with measured H-beta, [OIII], H-alpha, and [NII] emission lines, we investigate the location of AGN in the BPT, MEx (mass-excitation), and CEx (color-excitation) diagrams. We find that the BPT diagram works well to identify AGN at z~2.3 and that the z~0 AGN/star-forming galaxy classifications do not need to shift substantially at z~2.3 to robustly separate these populations. However, the MEx diagram fails to identify all of the AGN identified in the BPT diagram, and the CEx diagram is substantially contaminated at high redshift. We further show that AGN samples selected using the BPT diagram have selection biases in terms of both host stellar mass and stellar population, in that AGN in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
