Lift & Project Systems Performing on the Partial-Vertex-Cover Polytope

TL;DR

This paper investigates the limitations of lift-and-project LP and SDP relaxations in approximating the t-Partial-Vertex-Cover problem, revealing that these powerful models fail to provide tight bounds and highlighting surprising instances where simpler LPs outperform complex SDPs.

Contribution

It establishes nearly tight integrality gap lower bounds for various lift-and-project systems on t-PVC, and introduces a new methodology for constructing solutions that satisfy SDP relaxations.

Findings

Lift-and-project systems have unbounded integrality gaps for t-PVC.

Simple LP relaxations can outperform complex SDP relaxations on certain instances.

The paper provides a new methodology for constructing solutions to LP relaxations.

Abstract

We study integrality gap (IG) lower bounds on strong LP and SDP relaxations derived by the Sherali-Adams (SA), Lovasz-Schrijver-SDP (LS+), and Sherali-Adams-SDP (SA+) lift-and-project (L&P) systems for the t-Partial-Vertex-Cover (t-PVC) problem, a variation of the classic Vertex-Cover problem in which only t edges need to be covered. t-PVC admits a 2-approximation using various algorithmic techniques, all relying on a natural LP relaxation. Starting from this LP relaxation, our main results assert that for every epsilon > 0, level-Theta(n) LPs or SDPs derived by all known L&P systems that have been used for positive algorithmic results (but the Lasserre hierarchy) have IGs at least (1-epsilon)n/t, where n is the number of vertices of the input graph. Our lower bounds are nearly tight. Our results show that restricted yet powerful models of computation derived by many L&P systems fail to witness c-approximate solutions to t-PVC for any constant c, and for t = O(n). This is one of the very few known examples of an intractable combinatorial optimization problem for which LP-based algorithms induce a constant approximation ratio, still lift-and-project LP and SDP tightenings of the same LP have unbounded IGs. We also show that the SDP that has given the best algorithm known for t-PVC has integrality gap n/t on instances that can be solved by the level-1 LP relaxation derived by the LS system. This constitutes another rare phenomenon where (even in specific instances) a static LP outperforms an SDP that has been used for the best approximation guarantee for the problem at hand. Finally, one of our main contributions is that we make explicit of a new and simple methodology of constructing solutions to LP relaxations that almost trivially satisfy constraints derived by all SDP L&P systems known to be useful for algorithmic positive results (except the La system).