Should we believe the results of UV-mm galaxy SED modelling?
Christopher C. Hayward, Daniel J. B. Smith

TL;DR
This study tests the reliability of UV-mm galaxy SED modelling using simulated galaxies, finding it generally effective but sensitive to dust extinction assumptions, thus supporting its use with some caution.
Contribution
It demonstrates the accuracy of MAGPHYS in recovering galaxy properties from synthetic data and highlights the impact of dust extinction models on SED fitting results.
Findings
MAGPHYS recovers most galaxy parameters accurately.
Results are consistent across viewing angles and time steps.
Using SMC-type dust extinction leads to larger errors.
Abstract
Galaxy spectral energy distribution (SED) modelling is a powerful tool, but constraining how well it is able to infer the true values for galaxy properties (e.g. the star formation rate, SFR) is difficult because independent determinations are often not available. However, galaxy simulations can provide a means of testing SED modelling techniques. Here, we present a numerical experiment in which we apply the SED modelling code MAGPHYS to ultraviolet (UV)--millimetre (mm) synthetic photometry generated from hydrodynamical simulations of an isolated disc galaxy and a major galaxy merger by performing three-dimensional dust radiative transfer. We compare the properties inferred from the SED modelling with the true values and find that MAGPHYS recovers most physical parameters of the simulated galaxies well. In particular, it recovers consistent parameters irrespective of the viewing angle,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
