Ambiguity in quantum-theoretical descriptions of experiments
John M. Myers, F. Hadi Madjid

TL;DR
This paper explores the inherent ambiguity in quantum descriptions of experiments, highlighting multiple explanations and results, and discusses implications for concepts like invariance and quantum key distribution security.
Contribution
It explicitly analyzes the multiplicity of descriptions in quantum theory and their implications, clarifying the logical gap between experimental results and explanations.
Findings
Quantum descriptions involve multiple explanations for the same results.
Multiplicity of descriptions affects the concept of invariance in quantum mechanics.
Implications for quantum key distribution security are discussed.
Abstract
This paper contributes to a burgeoning area of investigation, the ambiguity inherent in mathematics and the implications for physics of this ambiguity. To display the mathematical form of equations of quantum theory used to describe experiments, we make explicit the knobs by which the devices of an experiment are arranged and adjusted. A quantum description comes in two parts: (1) a statement of results of an experiment, expressed by probabilities of detections as functions of knob settings, and (2) an explanation of how we think these results come about, expressed by linear operators, also as functions of knob settings. Because quantum mechanics separates the two parts of any description, it is known that between the statements of results and the explanations lurks a logical gap: given any statement of results one has a choice of explanations. Here we work out some consequences of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography
