Positive psychology and romantic scientism: Reply to comments on Brown, Sokal, & Friedman (2013)
Nicholas J.L. Brown, Alan D. Sokal, Harris L. Friedman
TL;DR
This paper responds to critiques of a previous article, defending the authors' perspectives on positive psychology and scientific approaches to romance, clarifying misunderstandings and addressing concerns raised by commentators.
Contribution
It provides a detailed rebuttal to five critiques of their earlier work, clarifying the authors' stance on positive psychology and scientific methods in romantic research.
Findings
Clarifies misunderstandings about positive psychology
Addresses criticisms of scientific approaches in romance studies
Reaffirms the authors' original positions
Abstract
This is a response to five comments [American Psychologist 69, 626-629 and 632-635 (2014)] on our article arXiv:1307.7006.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.