The effect of patch potentials in Casimir force measurements determined by heterodyne Kelvin probe force microscopy
Joseph L. Garrett, David Somers, and Jeremy N. Munday

TL;DR
This study uses advanced Kelvin probe force microscopy to analyze how surface potential variations on gold surfaces affect precise Casimir force measurements, revealing that surface preparation influences patch potentials and force calculations.
Contribution
It demonstrates that heterodyne Kelvin probe force microscopy enhances spatial resolution and shows how patch potentials vary with surface treatment, impacting Casimir force measurements.
Findings
HAM-KPFM improves spatial resolution over AM-KPFM
Patch potentials depend on surface preparation methods
Calculated electrostatic pressures can match differences in Casimir models
Abstract
Measurements of the Casimir force require the elimination of electrostatic interactions between the surfaces. However, due to electrostatic patch potentials, the voltage required to minimize the total force may not be sufficient to completely nullify the electrostatic interaction. Thus, these surface potential variations cause an additional force, which can obscure the Casimir force signal. In this paper, we inspect the spatially varying surface potential (SP) of e-beamed, sputtered, sputtered and annealed, and template stripped gold surfaces with Heterodyne Amplitude Modulated Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy (HAM-KPFM). It is demonstrated that HAM-KPFM improves the spatial resolution of surface potential measurements compared to Amplitude Modulated Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy (AM-KPFM). We find that patch potentials vary depending on sample preparation, and that the calculated pressure…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
