On the relation between the 0.7-anomaly and the Kondo effect: Geometric Crossover between a Quantum Point Contact and a Kondo Quantum Dot
Jan Heyder, Florian Bauer, Enrico Schubert, David Borowsky, Dieter, Schuh, Werner Wegscheider, Jan von Delft, Stefan Ludwig

TL;DR
This study investigates the connection between the 0.7-anomaly in quantum point contacts and the Kondo effect in quantum dots, demonstrating a geometric crossover that reveals similar spin fluctuation behaviors and conductance features.
Contribution
The paper introduces a one-dimensional model capturing the transition between a quantum dot and a quantum point contact, linking their conductance anomalies through spin fluctuation analysis.
Findings
Strong negative magnetoconductance correlates with enhanced local spin fluctuations.
Fano interference effects observed in coexistence regimes.
Fabry-Perot resonances occur with flatter-than-parabolic barriers.
Abstract
Quantum point contacts (QPCs) and quantum dots (QDs), two elementary building blocks of semiconducting nanodevices, both exhibit famously anomalous conductance features: the 0.7-anomaly in the former case, the Kondo effect in the latter. For both the 0.7-anomaly and the Kondo effect, the conductance shows a remarkably similar low-energy dependence on temperature , source-drain voltage and magnetic field . In a recent publication [F. Bauer et al., Nature, 501, 73 (2013)], we argued that the reason for these similarities is that both a QPC and a KQD feature spin fluctuations that are induced by the sample geometry, confined in a small spatial regime, and enhanced by interactions. Here we further explore this notion experimentally and theoretically by studying the geometric crossover between a QD and a QPC, focussing on the -field dependence of the conductance. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
