On the role of recombination in common-envelope ejections
N. Ivanova, S. Justham, Ph. Podsiadlowski

TL;DR
This study explores how the timing and location of energy transfer, especially recombination energy, influence the dynamical outcomes of common-envelope events, revealing that rapid energy transfer and deep heating lead to instability and potential envelope ejection.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the outcome of common-envelope events depends more on energy transfer rate and location than on total energy, highlighting the limited role of recombination energy in wide orbit formation.
Findings
Envelope becomes dynamically unstable before energy equals initial binding energy.
Recombination energy mainly drives envelope expansion and instability.
Deep heating leads to more effective envelope ejection.
Abstract
The energy budget in common-envelope events (CEEs) is not well understood, with substantial uncertainty even over to what extent the recombination energy stored in ionised hydrogen and helium might be used to help envelope ejection. We investigate the reaction of a red-giant envelope to heating which mimics limiting cases of energy input provided by the orbital decay of a binary during a CEE, specifically during the post-plunge-in phase during which the spiral-in has been argued to occur on a time-scale longer than dynamical. We show that the outcome of such a CEE depends less on the total amount of energy by which the envelope is heated than on how rapidly the energy was transferred to the envelope and on where the envelope was heated. The envelope always becomes dynamically unstable before receiving net heat energy equal to the envelope's initial binding energy. We find two types of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
