Comment on "Fitting the annual modulation in DAMA with neutrons from muons and neutrinos''
P.S. Barbeau, J.I. Collar, Yu. Efremenko, K. Scholberg

TL;DR
This paper evaluates whether solar neutrino-induced neutrons could explain DAMA/LIBRA's annual modulation and concludes that such an explanation is unlikely due to the improbably large cross sections required.
Contribution
It provides an estimation showing that neutrino-induced neutron rates are insufficient to account for DAMA's observed modulation, challenging previous hypotheses.
Findings
Neutrino-induced neutron contribution is negligible in DAMA/LIBRA.
Required cross sections are several orders of magnitude larger than current calculations.
Solar neutrino effects are unlikely to explain DAMA's annual modulation.
Abstract
We estimate rates of solar neutrino-induced neutrons in a DAMA/LIBRA-like detector setup, and find that the needed contribution to explain the annual modulation would require neutrino-induced neutron cross sections several orders of magnitude larger than current calculations indicate. Although these cross sections have never been measured, it is likely that the solar-neutrino effect on DAMA/LIBRA is negligible.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
