Conformational selection in protein binding and function
Thomas R. Weikl, Fabian Paul

TL;DR
This review discusses how conformational selection and induced fit are interconnected mechanisms in protein binding, emphasizing the importance of timescale separation and experimental methods like NMR and FRET in characterizing these processes.
Contribution
It unifies conformational selection and induced fit as complementary processes, highlighting the role of timescale separation and proposing experimental approaches for their distinction.
Findings
Conformational selection involves pre-existing protein conformations prior to binding.
Timescale separation allows decoupling of binding and conformational changes.
Experimental methods can distinguish between conformational selection and induced fit.
Abstract
Protein binding and function often involves conformational changes. Advanced NMR experiments indicate that these conformational changes can occur in the absence of ligand molecules (or with bound ligands), and that the ligands may 'select' protein conformations for binding (or unbinding). In this review, we argue that this conformational selection requires transition times for ligand binding and unbinding that are small compared to the dwell times of proteins in different conformations, which is plausible for small ligand molecules. Such a separation of timescales leads to a decoupling and temporal ordering of binding/unbinding events and conformational changes. We propose that conformational-selection and induced-change processes (such as induced fit) are two sides of the same coin, because the temporal ordering is reversed in binding and unbinding direction. Conformational-selection…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
