Neutron Therapy in the 21st Century
Thomas K. Kroc, James S. Welsh

TL;DR
Neutron therapy is effective but lags behind modern radiation therapies in technology; advancing it requires better understanding of radiation-tissue interactions and improved delivery techniques.
Contribution
The paper reviews current neutron therapy status and outlines key radiobiological questions needed to modernize and optimize its clinical application.
Findings
Neutron therapy is effective but underdeveloped technologically.
Modern photon and proton therapies use advanced image-guidance and modulation.
Future improvements depend on understanding radiation interactions and tissue sensitivities.
Abstract
The question of whether or not neutron therapy works has been answered. It is a qualified yes, as is the case with all of radiation therapy. But, neutron therapy has not kept pace with the rest of radiation therapy in terms of beam delivery techniques. Modern photon and proton based external beam radiotherapy routinely implements image-guidance, beam intensity-modulation and 3-dimensional treatment planning. The current iteration of fast neutron radiotherapy does not. Addressing these deficiencies, however, is not a matter of technology or understanding, but resources. The future of neutron therapy lies in better understanding the interaction processes of radiation with living tissue. A combination of radiobiology and computer simulations is required in order to optimize the use of neutron therapy. The questions that need to be answered are: Can we connect the macroscopic with the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry · Nuclear Physics and Applications · Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
