The UVES Large Program for testing fundamental physics - III. Constraints on the fine-structure constant from 3 telescopes
T. M. Evans, M. T. Murphy, J. B. Whitmore, T. Misawa, M. Centurion, S., D'Odorico, S. Lopez, C. J. A. P. Martins, P. Molaro, P. Petitjean, H., Rahmani, R. Srianand, M. Wendt

TL;DR
This study uses high-quality spectra from three telescopes to test for variations in the fine-structure constant, employing supercalibration to minimize systematic errors, and finds results consistent with no variation at the parts-per-million level.
Contribution
First application of supercalibration and cross-telescope comparison in measuring the fine-structure constant, enhancing reliability of the results.
Findings
All measurements are consistent with no variation in $\alpha$ within 2-$\sigma$.
Achieved measurement uncertainties of 5.6–24 ppm statistically and 1.8–7.0 ppm systematically.
Demonstrated the effectiveness of supercalibration techniques in reducing systematic errors.
Abstract
Large statistical samples of quasar spectra have previously indicated possible cosmological variations in the fine-structure constant, . A smaller sample of higher signal-to-noise ratio spectra, with dedicated calibration, would allow a detailed test of this evidence. Towards that end, we observed equatorial quasar HS 15491919 with three telescopes: the Very Large Telescope, Keck and, for the first time in such analyses, Subaru. By directly comparing these spectra to each other, and by `supercalibrating' them using asteroid and iodine-cell tests, we detected and removed long-range distortions of the quasar spectra's wavelength scales which would have caused significant systematic errors in our measurements. For each telescope we measure the relative deviation in from the current laboratory value, , in 3 absorption systems at redshifts…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
