Quark confinement: dual superconductor picture based on a non-Abelian Stokes theorem and reformulations of Yang-Mills theory
Kei-Ichi Kondo, Seikou Kato, Akihiro Shibata, and Toru Shinohara

TL;DR
This paper reviews recent advances in understanding quark confinement through a gauge-independent dual superconductor picture, utilizing reformulations of Yang-Mills theory, non-Abelian Stokes theorem, and lattice simulations to provide numerical evidence for dual superconductivity.
Contribution
It introduces a gauge-independent framework for quark confinement using reformulated Yang-Mills theory and non-Abelian Stokes theorem, supported by lattice numerical evidence.
Findings
Demonstration of linear interquark potential with non-zero string tension
Evidence of Abelian and magnetic monopole dominance in confinement
Confirmation of the dual Meissner effect via flux tube measurements
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to review the recent progress in understanding quark confinement. The emphasis of this review is placed on how to obtain a manifestly gauge-independent picture for quark confinement supporting the dual superconductivity in the Yang-Mills theory, which should be compared with the Abelian projection proposed by 't Hooft. The basic tools are novel reformulations of the Yang-Mills theory based on change of variables extending the decomposition of the Yang-Mills field due to Cho, Duan-Ge and Faddeev-Niemi, together with the combined use of extended versions of the Diakonov-Petrov version of the non-Abelian Stokes theorem for the Wilson loop operator. Moreover, we give the lattice gauge theoretical versions of the reformulation of the Yang-Mills theory which enables us to perform the numerical simulations on the lattice. In fact, we present some…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
