Is the quantum state real? An extended review of $\psi$-ontology theorems

TL;DR

This review comprehensively discusses the Pusey--Barrett--Rudolph Theorem, its implications for the reality of the quantum state, and related arguments, highlighting the debate over whether the quantum state is ontic or epistemic.

Contribution

It provides a detailed explanation of the Pusey--Barrett--Rudolph Theorem, its assumptions, improvements, criticisms, and compares it with other arguments regarding the nature of the quantum state.

Findings

The Pusey--Barrett--Rudolph Theorem strongly constrains realist interpretations of quantum mechanics.

Arguments by Hardy and Colbeck-Renner are less compelling than PBR's assumptions.

Open questions remain about the epistemic interpretations of the quantum state.

Abstract

Towards the end of 2011, Pusey, Barrett and Rudolph derived a theorem that aimed to show that the quantum state must be ontic (a state of reality) in a broad class of realist approaches to quantum theory. This result attracted a lot of attention and controversy. The aim of this review article is to review the background to the Pusey--Barrett--Rudolph Theorem, to provide a clear presentation of the theorem itself, and to review related work that has appeared since the publication of the Pusey--Barrett--Rudolph paper. In particular, this review: Explains what it means for the quantum state to be ontic or epistemic (a state of knowledge); Reviews arguments for and against an ontic interpretation of the quantum state as they existed prior to the Pusey--Barrett--Rudolph Theorem; Explains why proving the reality of the quantum state is a very strong constraint on realist theories in that it would imply many of the known no-go theorems, such as Bell's Theorem and the need for an exponentially large ontic state space; Provides a comprehensive presentation of the Pusey--Barrett--Rudolph Theorem itself, along with subsequent improvements and criticisms of its assumptions; Reviews two other arguments for the reality of the quantum state: the first due to Hardy and the second due to Colbeck and Renner, and explains why their assumptions are less compelling than those of the Pusey--Barrett--Rudolph Theorem; Reviews subsequent work aimed at ruling out stronger notions of what it means for the quantum state to be epistemic and points out open questions in this area. The overall aim is not only to provide the background needed for the novice in this area to understand the current status, but also to discuss often overlooked subtleties that should be of interest to the experts.