Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): Refining the Local Galaxy Merger Rate using Morphological Information
Kevin R. V. Casteels, Christopher J. Conselice, Steven P. Bamford,, Eduard Salvador-Sole, Peder R. Norberg, Nicola K. Agius, Ivan Baldry, Sarah, Brough, Michael J. I. Brown, Michael J. Drinkwater, Simon P. Driver, Alister, W. Graham, Joss Bland-Hawthorn, Andrew M. Hopkins

TL;DR
This study uses the GAMA survey to measure the local galaxy merger rate and the link between mergers and asymmetrical galaxy features, revealing mass-dependent variations in merger fractions and rates.
Contribution
It introduces a new measurement of the local galaxy major merger rate using morphological asymmetry analysis and explores how mergers depend on galaxy mass.
Findings
Major merger fraction is roughly constant at 1.3-2% for certain mass ranges.
The galaxy major merger rate approximately triples across the studied mass range.
Total co-moving volume major merger rate is estimated at (1.2 ± 0.5) × 10^{-3} h^{3}_{70} Mpc^{-3} Gyr^{-1}.
Abstract
We use the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey to measure the local Universe mass dependent merger fraction and merger rate using galaxy pairs and the CAS structural method, which identifies highly asymmetric merger candidate galaxies. Our goals are to determine which types of mergers produce highly asymmetrical galaxies, and to provide a new measurement of the local galaxy major merger rate. We examine galaxy pairs at stellar mass limits down to with mass ratios of 100:1 and line of sight velocity differences of km s. We find a significant increase in mean asymmetries for projected separations less than the sum of the individual galaxy's Petrosian 90 radii. For systems in major merger pairs with mass ratios of 4:1 both galaxies in the pair show a strong increase in asymmetry, while in minor merger systems (with mass ratios of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
