First Frontier Field Constraints on the Cosmic Star-Formation Rate Density at z~10 - The Impact of Lensing Shear on Completeness of High-Redshift Galaxy Samples
P. A. Oesch (Yale YCAA), R. J. Bouwens (Leiden), G. D. Illingworth, (UCSC), M. Franx (Leiden), S. M. Ammons (LLNL), P. G. van Dokkum (Yale), M., Trenti (IoA Cambridge), I. Labbe (Leiden)

TL;DR
This study uses Hubble Frontier Field data to refine the cosmic star-formation rate density at z~10, highlighting the importance of lensing shear effects on the detectability of high-redshift galaxies and providing new constraints consistent with a rapid decline in star formation.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed analysis of lensing shear effects on high-redshift galaxy detection, improving estimates of star-formation rate density at z~10 using Frontier Field data.
Findings
Lensing shear and source blending significantly reduce the completeness of high-z galaxy samples.
The star-formation rate density at z~10 is higher than previous estimates but still indicates a rapid decline.
Results are consistent with cosmological simulations predicting a steep decrease in star formation from z~8 to z~10.
Abstract
We search the complete Hubble Frontier Field dataset of Abell 2744 and its parallel field for z~10 sources to further refine the evolution of the cosmic star-formation rate density (SFRD) at z>8. We independently confirm two images of the recently discovered triply-imaged z~9.8 source by Zitrin et al. (2014) and set an upper limit for similar z~10 galaxies with red colors of J_125-H_160>1.2 in the parallel field of Abell 2744. We utilize extensive simulations to derive the effective selection volume of Lyman-break galaxies at z~10, both in the lensed cluster field and in the adjacent parallel field. Particular care is taken to include position-dependent lensing shear to accurately account for the expected sizes and morphologies of highly-magnified sources. We show that both source blending and shear reduce the completeness at a given observed magnitude in the cluster, particularly near…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
